Why is Max Blumenthal considered an "angel of death"? On what grounds is he perceived in a negative way? I have only known him for his debunking of certain Israeli claims about who was responsible for the massacre on October 7th and the following days. His stance that heavy destruction and the associated death toll were down to Israelli military made a lot of sense. In fact, the evidence is material, and irrefutable. On the other hand, the Israeli claims are outlandish, and do not correspond to what physical damage can be seen on photos. So whence the negative angle on Blumenthal?
Blumenthal comes from a rich family close to the Clintons. He is a Jewish gatekeeper. One will never understand the conflict in Palestine by listening to such people because their mission is to deflect from the fact that the Jewish state came about because of the Jewish question and the Jewish question, the question concerning Jewish power and influence in the world in all spheres from finance to culture, is never addressed. Blumenthal, of course, is ‘left-wing’ and ‘atheist’, the usual Jewish persona. Blumenthal and his Jewish colleagues are the left-wing ‘anti-Zionist’ department of political Judaism.
Thank you for your reply, which I've only seen today. Even though he may be left-wing, Blumenthal's arguments about October 7th are factual and pertinent. They don't focus on Jewish power and influence all around, but on the precise event that the leaders of the Jewish State used to start the genocide. I still do not understand what is wrong with that.
On the wider question about Jewish influence you raised, I do not deny its relevance. There are practical problems in addressing it due to (holocaustical) mind control and ensuing hysterical reactions. Still, it needs to be done.
I'd like to share an article by a writer I came across recently, "How the British Invented Globalism" by Richard Poe:
If you find it interesting then Poe's subsequent articles, which get much longer, will also be of interest. What I found interesting in particular (and this is in the longest article about the invention of communism) is the creation of conspiracy narratives by the British (notably by Churchill, using British propaganda asset Nesta Helen Webster) shifting all the blame on the Jews when objectively it seems dubious they had the power to actually overthrow the Russian Monarchy.
Why is Max Blumenthal considered an "angel of death"? On what grounds is he perceived in a negative way? I have only known him for his debunking of certain Israeli claims about who was responsible for the massacre on October 7th and the following days. His stance that heavy destruction and the associated death toll were down to Israelli military made a lot of sense. In fact, the evidence is material, and irrefutable. On the other hand, the Israeli claims are outlandish, and do not correspond to what physical damage can be seen on photos. So whence the negative angle on Blumenthal?
Blumenthal comes from a rich family close to the Clintons. He is a Jewish gatekeeper. One will never understand the conflict in Palestine by listening to such people because their mission is to deflect from the fact that the Jewish state came about because of the Jewish question and the Jewish question, the question concerning Jewish power and influence in the world in all spheres from finance to culture, is never addressed. Blumenthal, of course, is ‘left-wing’ and ‘atheist’, the usual Jewish persona. Blumenthal and his Jewish colleagues are the left-wing ‘anti-Zionist’ department of political Judaism.
Thank you for your reply, which I've only seen today. Even though he may be left-wing, Blumenthal's arguments about October 7th are factual and pertinent. They don't focus on Jewish power and influence all around, but on the precise event that the leaders of the Jewish State used to start the genocide. I still do not understand what is wrong with that.
On the wider question about Jewish influence you raised, I do not deny its relevance. There are practical problems in addressing it due to (holocaustical) mind control and ensuing hysterical reactions. Still, it needs to be done.
I'd like to share an article by a writer I came across recently, "How the British Invented Globalism" by Richard Poe:
https://www.richardpoe.com/2021/04/27/how-the-british-invented-globalism/
If you find it interesting then Poe's subsequent articles, which get much longer, will also be of interest. What I found interesting in particular (and this is in the longest article about the invention of communism) is the creation of conspiracy narratives by the British (notably by Churchill, using British propaganda asset Nesta Helen Webster) shifting all the blame on the Jews when objectively it seems dubious they had the power to actually overthrow the Russian Monarchy.
Extraordinary article that provides lucidity.
Thank you Frank!